At the College Basketball Roundtable each week, we ask each representative of the coverage employees for their view nigh on a contemporary topic.
College basketball newsAt the College Basketball Roundtable each week, we ask each adherent of the coverage baton for their opinion of the order of a modern topic.
THIS WEEK’S QUESTION: What do you feel of CBS’ move to replace Billy Packer with Clark Kellogg as the network’s lead game analyst?
I believe emotive Packer out was a good evaluation. His act had worn thin on the middle-of-the-road of the appointment.
To me, he had the line from opinionated to . I’m sure he believed all of his , but too many were coming off as just for quarrel’s sake.
I cogitate it was only a theme of time before Packer put his foot so far into his mouth as to gatehouse a Converse in his esophagus.
For North Carolina fans, he accomplished that medical feat during the Final Four.
Is Kellogg the right best?
Let’s put it like this: He’s the safe prime. He’s not going to assemblage the ire Packer did, and I dubious that’s just how CBS wants it for a while.
The guy I would have gone and , nevertheless, is ESPN’s Jay Bilas. He’s the best and brightest young analyst in the university game, and he would have blossomed with the occasion to call the Final Four for years to come.
I wasn’t disenchanted to hear Packer was on his way out until I who CBS is replacing him with.
Kellogg is everything Packer isn’t.
Packer is exceedingly opinionated. He’ll talk not far off any viable issue at time.
Kellogg is more like the constitutional contestant of TV basketball analysts. He says only what is safe, with negligible, if any, drollness entangled.
I often disagreed with Packer and often originate him to be peevish. But you could for ever and a day sum total on Packer to speak his mind regardless of the situation.
Remember when he blatant the home game between North Carolina-Kansas this past time was over in the first half?
We won’t hear no matter what like that from the careful Kellogg. CBS would have been better off going with name with more traits like Digger Phelps or a clever, young analyst like Jay Bilas or Doug Gottlieb.
While I revered Packer’s knowledge and his enthusiasm for the game, I won’t miss him that much. He was an ACC (the platitudes Packer heaped on former North Carolina tutor Dean Smith would circle the globe roughly speaking 30,000 ), didn’t do his project on leagues outside the “Big Six,” for no reason met a point he couldn’t nicker into the ground for 20 log and normally seemed to annex on a bit of minutiae that had entirely no bearing on the game. His different occupational interests also led to some conflicts of note, but that’s not of necessity pertinent to this inquiry.
Actually, I will miss him a bit during the NCAA tourney. He no way was afraid to express his attitude, and given his background and knowledge of the game, you at least had to listen. Thus, not having Packer around during the to make you shake your head is going to be fractious to get used to. As for his unused, Kellogg is a nice guy, but he’s also as as they come. Will he ever say everything controversial or thought-aggravating?
While Packer had a long, noteworthy run as an analyst, it was time for him to go. And love him or hate him, perhaps the best size of Packer’s shock is that it is awfully involved to think up the same width of news coverage when his standby is .
Monday, July 21st, 2008 at 12:10 am and is filed under College basketball news. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
